• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    Method and arrangement for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement of a rail vehicle. The invention relates to a method for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement with a plurality of brake systems of a rail vehicle. In order to be able to carry out such a method comparatively cost-effectively and gently for the wheel and rail, according to the invention the deceleration of the rail vehicle is detected with a deceleration measured variable (Δd
    公开号:AU2012358735A1
    申请号:U2012358735
    申请日:2012-10-29
    公开日:2014-06-19
    发明作者:Werner Breuer；Lars Lowenstein；Alexander RAMBETIUS；Wolfgang Rulka；Thorsten Stutzle
    申请人:Siemens AG；
    IPC主号:B60T17-22
    专利说明:
    PCT/EP2012/071329 - 1 2011P22596WOUS Description Method and arrangement for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement of a rail vehicle German patent DE 195 10 755 C2 discloses a brake arrangement for a rail-bound tractive unit having a plurality of brake systems. In this known brake arrangement, the braking effect is monitored by detecting the deceleration in the case of braking, and a deceleration signal is generated given too small a braking effect. By means of this deceleration signal, measures are automatically triggered which bring about the largest possible residual braking effect by using all of the brake systems which are present in the rail vehicle. In this context, the gritting system is also activated in order to take into account the possible error situation in which failure of the brake which is detected due to the occurrence of the error signal could be due to very low frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail. This leads to a situation in which the wear of the wheel and the rail is, under certain circumstances, unnecessarily increased through the activated gritting system, and grit is spread, possibly also in the region of sensitive rail switch tongues. Furthermore, a gritting system which has a relatively large volume and is therefore expensive has to be used. The invention is based on the object of specifying a method for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement having a plurality of brake systems of a rail vehicle, which method can be carried out comparatively cost-effectively while minimizing the wear and tear to the wheel and to the rail system. The means of achieving this object are according to the invention a method for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement of a rail vehicle, in which the deceleration of the PCT/EP2012/071329 - la 2011P22596WOUS rail vehicle is detected by obtaining a deceleration measured variable and the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail is detected by obtaining a frictional engagement measured variable; in the case PCT/EP2012/071329 - 2 2011P22596WOUS of a small deceleration measured variable and a normal frictional engagement measured variable an error message signal is generated. A significant advantage of the method according to the invention is that an error message signal is generated only when the brake system which is to be monitored is actually defective or disrupted, with the result that it is only then that, for example, a gritting system is selectively activated and/or a further brake system switched on. In the method according to the invention the grit is therefore handled more economically, which permits a relatively small gritting system and minimizes the wear and tear on the wheels and the rail system. According to the invention, a further means of achieving the object specified above is a method for monitoring a brake system having at least one brake actuator of a brake arrangement having a plurality of brake systems of a rail vehicle, in which the deceleration of the rail vehicle is detected by obtaining a deceleration measured variable, and the braking force of the at least one brake actuator is measured; in the case of a small deceleration measured variable and a small braking force an error message signal is generated. The brake actuator is preferably an electric motor. This embodiment of the method according to the invention is advantageous in particular in that a further brake system is not activated here immediately either but instead firstly it is checked whether there is a large probability of the excessively small deceleration being actually due to damage to the monitored brake system. Moreover, this embodiment also has the advantages specified above. In the method according to the invention, the deceleration of the rail vehicle can be detected in a variety of ways. In order PCT/EP2012/071329 - 2a 2011P22596WOUS to achieve the most precise possible detection, a deceleration difference actual value is formed from a measured deceleration actual value and a predefined deceleration setpoint value and is compared with a deceleration difference threshold value by forming PCT/EP2012/071329 - 3 2011P22596WOUS a deceleration difference intermediate value; in the case of a deceleration difference intermediate value which is above a tolerance value, an error message pre-signal is generated. In particular in the case of a brake system of a brake arrangement of a rail vehicle for the high-speed field it is considered advantageous if the deceleration setpoint value is changed as a function of a measured speed actual value of the rail vehicle. In order not to obtain an error message signal every time the rail vehicle comes to a stationary state at a low velocity, the speed actual value of the rail vehicle is advantageously compared with a speed limiting value; in the case of a speed actual value which is below the speed limiting value, the formation of the error message signal is blocked. Alternatively, it is advantageously possible to measure a speed actual value of the rail vehicle and compare it with a speed limiting value, and in the case of a speed actual value which is below the speed limiting value, the deceleration difference threshold value can be increased. The frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail can be detected in different ways with the method according to the invention. It is considered particularly advantageous if, in order to detect the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail at at least one wheel set of the rail vehicle, a slip actual value is measured and is compared with a predefined slip threshold value; in the case of a slip actual value which is above the slip threshold value, a corresponding deceleration difference threshold value is formed as a frictional engagement measured variable.
    PCT/EP2012/071329 - 4 2011P22596WOUS In this context, the detection accuracy is advantageously increased if the deceleration difference threshold value is increased in accordance with the determined number of wheel sets with slip actual values which are above the slip threshold value. It can also be advantageous if, in order to detect the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail at at least one wheel set of the rail vehicle, a frictional engagement actual value in the wheel/rail contact is determined and is compared with a predefined frictional engagement threshold value, and in the case of a frictional engagement actual value which is below the frictional engagement threshold value, a corresponding deceleration difference threshold value is formed as a frictional engagement measured variable. It is also advantageous here if the deceleration difference threshold value is increased in accordance with the determined number of wheel sets with frictional engagement actual values which are below the frictional engagement threshold value. In order to check whether in the case of a brake system with brake actuators the latter possibly do not generate any driving effect at all, with the method according to the invention in the case of a brake system with at least one brake actuator a deceleration measurement signal and a speed measured variable of the rail vehicle are advantageously checked with respect to their signs, and in the case of identical signs an error signal for connecting a further brake system is generated immediately. With the method according to the invention, in order to detect deceleration measured variables and speed measured variables sensors of differing designs are used. It is particularly advantageous to use an inertia sensor package. This applies particularly to the case in which the signs of the deceleration and speed of the rail vehicle are to be determined.
    PCT/EP2012/071329 - 5 2011P22596WOUS With the method according to the invention with detection of the braking force of brake actuators it is possible to measure this force in different ways. It therefore appears advantageous if the braking force measurement is carried out by means of a force measurement and/or torque measurement on an axle of the rail vehicle which is assigned to the brake actuator. However, it may also be advantageous to perform the braking force measurement by means of sensors on a deformation body which is reversibly deformed by the braking. The braking force measurement can also advantageously be carried out in the case of an electric actuator by measuring currents and voltages. The further processing of the measured braking force is advantageously carried out in such a way that a force difference actual value is formed from a measured force actual value and a predefined force setpoint value, the force difference actual value is compared with a force difference threshold value by forming a force difference intermediate value, and in the case of a force difference intermediate value which is above a tolerance value, a force defect signal is generated. In the case of a rail vehicle, in particular in the high-speed field, it can be advantageous if the force setpoint value is changed as a function of a measured speed actual value of the rail vehicle. It can also be advantageous if the force setpoint value is changed as a function of the rotational speed of a wheel set which is connected to the brake actuator. The invention is also based on the object of proposing an arrangement for monitoring a brake system of a brake PCT/EP2012/071329 - 5a 2011P22596WOUS arrangement having a plurality of brake systems of a rail vehicle, with which the brake system can be monitored cost- PCT/EP2012/071329 - 6 2011P22596WOUS effectively while minimizing wear and tear to the wheel and rail system. In order to achieve this object, according to the invention an arrangement is provided for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement having a plurality of brake systems of a rail vehicle, having a measuring device for the deceleration of the rail vehicle, a measuring apparatus for the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail, and an evaluation arrangement which is arranged downstream of the measuring device and the measuring apparatus and outputs an error message signal in the case of a small deceleration of the rail vehicle and a normal frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail. As a result, accordingly the same advantages can be achieved which have already been specified above with respect to the method according to the invention. A further solution of the object specified above consists in an arrangement for monitoring a brake system having at least one brake actuator of a brake arrangement having a plurality of brake systems of a rail vehicle, having a measuring device for the deceleration of the rail vehicle, a measuring arrangement for the braking force of the at least one brake actuator, and an evaluation arrangement which is arranged downstream of the measuring device and the measuring arrangement and outputs an error message signal in the case of a small deceleration and a small braking force. As a result, the same advantages can be achieved as are specified above with respect to the method for monitoring a brake system having at least one brake actuator. With the arrangement according to the invention the measuring device can be embodied in different ways. The measuring device PCT/EP2012/071329 - 6a 2011P22596WOUS is particularly advantageously embodied in such a way that it forms a deceleration difference actual value from a measured deceleration actual value and a predefined deceleration setpoint value as a PCT/EP2012/071329 - 7 2011P22596WOUS deceleration measured variable, it compares the deceleration difference actual value with a deceleration difference threshold value as a frictional engagement measured variable by forming a deceleration difference intermediate value, and in the case of a deceleration difference intermediate value which is above a tolerance value, it generates an error message pre signal. The arrangement according to the invention can also be embodied in different ways with respect to the detection of the speed. It appears advantageous if a detection device, in which the speed actual value of the rail vehicle is compared with a speed limiting value, is arranged upstream of the evaluation arrangement, and which detection device, in the case of a speed actual value which is below the speed limiting value, outputs a blocking signal to the evaluation arrangement, with which blocking signal formation of the error message signal in the evaluation arrangement is blocked. In order to avoid an error message signal being output every time when the rail vehicle comes to a stationary state, the measuring device advantageously has on the input side an evaluation stage which is connected by its input to the output of an inertia sensor package and is embodied in such a way that it outputs at its output a speed measured variable, which is not influenced by the acceleration due to gravity or the centrifugal acceleration, of the rail vehicle. An inertia sensor package is known, for example, from htp: //de. kipedia. org/wi . k g /inri i al-sen sor . Furthermore, it is advantageous if the evaluation stage is also connected on the output side to the measuring apparatus and with its speed measured variable causes an increase in the deceleration difference threshold value to occur at said measuring apparatus in the case of a speed actual value which is below a speed limiting value.
    PCT/EP2012/071329 - 7a 2011P22596WOUS Alternatively, it is also possible that in the case of a speed which is below a predefined threshold, checking for an PCT/EP2012/071329 - 8 2011P22596WOUS excessively low deceleration actual value is not performed at all. With the arrangement according to the invention, the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail can be detected in different ways; a plurality of possibilities are known for this. It is advantageous if, with the arrangement according to the invention, in order to detect the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail at at least one wheel set of the rail vehicle, a slip actual value measuring stage is provided in which the measured slip actual value is compared with a predefined slip threshold value, and which, in the case of a slip actual value which is above the slip threshold value, brings about an increase in the corresponding deceleration difference threshold value. In this context it is also advantageous if a counter for determining the number of wheel sets with slip actual values which are above the slip threshold value is present, which counter generates a signal for increasing the deceleration difference threshold value in accordance with the determined number of wheel sets with slip actual values which are above the slip threshold value. It also appears advantageous if, in order to detect the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail at at least one wheel set of the rail vehicle, a measuring stage for the frictional engagement actual value in the wheel/rail contact is provided, which measuring stage is designed to compare the frictional engagement actual value with a predefined frictional engagement threshold value and to form a corresponding deceleration difference threshold value in the case of a frictional engagement actual value which is below the frictional engagement threshold value.
    PCT/EP2012/071329 - 8a 2011P22596WOUS In this embodiment of the arrangement according to the invention a counting stage is advantageously present which detects the number of wheel sets with frictional engagement actual values which are below the frictional engagement threshold value and outputs a counting signal for increasing the deceleration difference PCT/EP2012/071329 - 9 2011P22596WOUS threshold value in accordance with the determined number of wheel sets with frictional engagement actual values which are below the frictional engagement threshold value. In order to check damage to the brake system directly with the arrangement according to the invention having a brake actuator it is advantageous if at least one force/torque meter is arranged upstream of the measuring arrangement of the arrangement according to the invention and is provided on an axle of the rail vehicle which is assigned to the brake actuator. It is particularly advantageous if the measuring arrangement and the evaluation arrangement are embodied in such a way that they form a braking force difference actual value from a measured braking force actual value and a predefined braking force setpoint value, they compare the braking force difference actual value with a braking force difference threshold value by forming a braking force difference intermediate value, and in the case of a braking force difference intermediate value which is above a tolerance value, they generate a braking force defect signal (LF). However, it can also be advantageous for a deformation body which can be reversibly deformed by the braking to be provided with sensors for measuring the braking force. Alternatively or additionally, in the case of an electric actuator it is advantageously possible to assign a current measuring device and/or voltage measuring device thereto for measuring the braking force. In addition it is considered as advantageous if a high-speed activation stage is provided which is supplied on the input side with a measured variable which is proportional to the deceleration and with a measured variable which is proportional PCT/EP2012/071329 - 9a 2011P22596WOUS to the speed of the rail vehicle, and said high-speed activation stage is embodied in such a way that it checks the measured variables with respect to their signs, and in the case of identical signs immediately generates an error signal for connecting a further brake system. Such a high-speed connection stage is advantageous not only in the present context but also can PCT/EP2012/071329 - 10 2011P22596WOUS generally be used advantageously in any arrangement for monitoring a brake system in which apart from the deceleration the speed of the rail vehicle is also detected. For this purpose, an inertia sensor package is advantageously provided with which the magnitude and signs of the deceleration and speed of the rail vehicle are determined. In order to explain the invention further, fig. 1 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the arrangement according to the invention for monitoring a brake system, fig. 2 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of an evaluation stage according to the exemplary embodiment in fig. 1, fig. 3 illustrates a further exemplary embodiment of the arrangement according to the invention for monitoring a brake system having a brake actuator, and fig. 4 illustrates an additional exemplary embodiment of the arrangement according to the invention in an embodiment which is simplified compared to the exemplary embodiment according to fig. 3, each of the figures being illustrated as a block circuit diagram. The arrangement which is illustrated in figure 1 for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement of a rail vehicle (not illustrated) contains, as essential components, a measuring device 1 for detecting the deceleration of the rail vehicle, a measuring apparatus 2 for detecting the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail in the case of the rail vehicle, and an evaluation arrangement 3 which outputs an error message signal BF when there is a small deceleration of the rail vehicle compared to the normal case and a normal frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail. The measuring device 1 contains an inertia sensor package 1A which has an acceleration sensor which is not illustrated PCT/EP2012/071329 - 10a 2011P22596WOUS individually and which is parallel to the vehicle longitudinal axis of the rail vehicle. A deceleration actual value ax is measured with this acceleration sensor of the inertia sensor package 1A. Connected to the inertia sensor package 1A or to the acceleration sensor thereof PCT/EP2012/071329 - 11 2011P22596WOUS is an absolute value former 4 which forms the absolute value of the measured deceleration actual value and generates a positive deceleration actual value dact at its output. Arranged downstream of the absolute value former 4 is in turn a subtractor 5 which is also supplied with a deceleration setpoint value dsetp. A deceleration difference actual value Adact is then produced at the output of the subtractor 5 and therefore also at the output 6 of the measuring device 1. The measuring apparatus 2 contains a rotational speed sensor 7 with which the rotational speeds ci, 2 ... , on are measured, wherein the various axle rotational speeds correspond to the various braked wheel sets of the rail vehicle. The axle rotational speed measured variables which are acquired in this way are fed to an element 8 which determines the number k of wheel sets with a low frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail. This element 8 is also supplied with a measured variable v which corresponds to the velocity of the rail vehicle, which measured variable v is obtained in a manner which will be described in more detail below. In the element 8, the actual value of the slip between the wheel and the rail is determined for each wheel set at which the brake system is to be active, using the wheel radii actual values, the axle rotational speeds which are obtained and the velocity v. If the respective slip actual value exceeds a predefined slip threshold value, the associated wheel set is considered to be slipping and braking with a low frictional engagement. By summing, the element 8 obtains the number k of wheel sets with a low frictional engagement and feeds this value to a nonlinear element 9. The nonlinear element 9 determines a positive deceleration difference threshold value adsetp as a function of the number of slipping wheel sets k using a monotonously rising function. This means that as the number of slipping wheel sets k increases, the deceleration difference threshold value adsetp increases. As a result, the permitted tolerance for the difference between the setpoint deceleration and actual PCT/EP2012/071329 - 11a 2011P22596WOUS deceleration accordingly increases. Owing to this frictional engagement-dependent adaptation of the tolerance it is possible with a high level of probability to assume that an error message signal PCT/EP2012/071329 - 12 2011P22596WOUS actually occurs only in the case of damage to the brake system used in the rail vehicle. The deceleration difference threshold value signal Adsetp occurs at an output 10 of the measuring apparatus 2. The evaluation arrangement 3 which is arranged downstream of the measuring device 1 and the measuring apparatus 2 has on the input side a further subtractor 11 to which on the one hand the deceleration difference actual value Adact is fed by the measuring device 1 and the deceleration difference threshold value adsetp is fed by the measuring apparatus 2; a deceleration difference intermediate value ad 2 : is then present at the input of the further subtractor 11. If the output of the further subtractor 11 is larger than zero, the logic signal <0 is set at its output to a high level by a downstream two-point element 12. A high level of the signal LD indicates an excessively low deceleration of the entire rail vehicle and therefore constitutes a deceleration defect signal LD. If the output of the further subtractor 11 is less than zero, the logic signal remains at a low level. The deceleration defect signal LD is fed to an AND gate 13 to which further logic signals LV, BRt and DS are fed. So that these four signals give rise to a logic error message intermediate signal LB at the output of the AND gate 13, further conditions must be met, details of which will be given below. Firstly a braking request must actually be present since this signals that a braking process is underway. Such a braking request is represented by the low level of the logic signal BR with which a lag element 14 is supplied. The signal BR is delayed by the duration of the necessary braking force design by means of this lag element 14; this results in the output signal BRt of the lag element 14 with a high level.
    PCT/EP2012/071329 - 13 2011P22596WOUS The monitoring of the braking effect of the brake system to be monitored takes place appropriately exclusively above a limiting velocity vuimit. For this purpose, the measured variable of the velocity v is firstly acquired from the sensor signals of the inertia sensor package 1A through suitable evaluation in an evaluation stage 15A. Depending on the direction in which the vehicle is traveling, the sign of the measured variable of the velocity v can be positive or negative, for which reason the measured variable is fed to a further absolute value former 16. In this absolute value former 16, a positive velocity actual value vact is formed, which velocity actual value vact is subtracted from the positive velocity limiting value vuimit using an additional subtractor 17; the absolute value former 16 and the additional subtractor 17 form, together with the evaluation stage 15A, a detection device 15. As soon as the velocity actual value is below the velocity limiting value vuimit, the output of the additional subtractor is greater than zero and a further two-point element 18 switches its logic output signal as a blocking signal LV to a high level. Furthermore, in the illustrated exemplary embodiment it is to be ensured that actuators, which are provided for braking and are not illustrated, of the brake system to be monitored do not generate a driving effect. The downstream evaluation element 19 determines whether the signs of the speed v and of the deceleration ax are different. Only if this is the case does the additional element 19 output the logic signal DS with a high level. If all the signals LD, LV, BRt and DS are present with a high level at the AND gate 13 simultaneously, the latter generates a signal LB which is fed to an OR element 20. A signal NB of a further AND element 21, which is supplied with the logic signal DS by the further element 19 and with the signal BRt by the lag PCT/EP2012/071329 - 13a 2011P22596WOUS stage 14, is also present on the input side at this OR element 20.
    PCT/EP2012/071329 - 14 2011P22596WOUS With the further AND gate 21 it is checked whether or not the brake system to be monitored generates a driving effect. If this is the case, the signal DS has a high level and in the case of a signal BRt also having a high level the logic signal 5 NB at the output of the further AND gate 21 is set to a high level. The two logic signals LB and NB therefore each signal damage to the monitored brake system with the result that a logic signal 0 BF is output as an error message signal by the OR gate 20. In the case of a high level, at least one other brake system than that already used is activated by the error message signal BF. The evaluation stage 15A which is illustrated in figure 2 is, 5 on the one hand, connected on the input side to the inertia sensor package 1A according to figure 1 and also supplied with a stationary state signal ST, which is set to a high level, if the rail vehicle is stationary. On the input side, the evaluation stage 15A is provided with two splitters 30 and 31 0 with which the six signals ax, ay, az and ox, coy and oz are firstly divided into three acceleration signals ax, ay and az as well as into three rotational speed signals ox, oy and oz. The measuring axis of the sensor which is associated with the acceleration signal ax is parallel to the longitudinal axis of 5 the rail vehicle here. The sensor signals each have bias errors, cross-sensitivity errors, a temperature response, measuring noise etc. In a compensation element 32, these errors are compensated in the case of the acceleration signals according to known methods. The same occurs with the rotational 0 speed signals in the additional compensation element 33. Arranged downstream of the two compensation elements 32 and 33 is a transformation element 34 in which, according to the known method, the vector for the acceleration due to gravity of the inertia system is transformed into the sensor coordinate system 5 by, for example, calculating the Euler angle.
    PCT/EP2012/071329 - 14a 2011P22596WOUS The transformed vector serves to compensate the portion of the acceleration due to gravity which is contained in the measured acceleration signals PCT/EP2012/071329 - 15 2011P22596WOUS by using a summing element 35, which is also connected to the one compensation element 32. On the input side an element 36 for determining the centrifugal 5 acceleration is also connected to the output of the additional compensation element 33, in which element 36 the portion of the centrifugal acceleration which is contained in the acceleration signals is obtained according to the known method. A further summing element 37 is arranged downstream of this element 36 0 for obtaining the centrifugal acceleration and is also connected by a further input to the output of the summing element 35. The acceleration signals which are compensated by the acceleration due to gravity and the centrifugal acceleration are therefore present at the output of the further 5 subtractor 37. A switch 38 which is arranged downstream of the further summing element feeds the compensated acceleration signals to an integrator 39, downstream of which an additional splitter 40 is 0 arranged. The first signal which is selected by this splitter 40 is the velocity v. The logic stationary state signal ST is set to a high level by a device which is not shown if the rail vehicle is stationary. 5 As soon as this signaling takes place, the compensated accelerations are set to zero using the element 41 by the switch 38. Likewise, the time integrals are set to zero by means of a reset input RS of the integrator 39, as a result of which the drifting time integrals or the velocity are 0 calibrated. In the transformation element 34, an integrator can be contained which is used to calculate the transformed vector for the acceleration due to gravity. The integrator is set to new 5 initial values at the high level of the logic stationary state signal ST, which new initial values can depend on the current values of the measured acceleration signals a,, ay and az.
    PCT/EP2012/071329 - 16 2011P22596WOUS The exemplary embodiment according to fig. 3 coincides in large part to that according to fig. 1, for which reason identical reference symbols are used for corresponding parts. A measuring apparatus is no longer provided here, instead a deceleration 5 difference threshold value signal Adsetp is permanently predefined. However, a measuring arrangement 49 is arranged downstream of a force sensor 50 which is connected in a way not illustrated to a brake system which is to be monitored and has at least one brake actuator. 0 In the present exemplary embodiment, by using the sensor 50 the force f is measured in order to obtain the braking effect of the brake actuator (not shown) on an axle of the rail vehicle which is assigned thereto. Since the measured variable which 5 corresponds to the force f is signed, it is initially fed to an absolute value former 51 which forms the positive force actual value fact. The positive force actual value fact is subtracted from the predefinable positive force setpoint value fsetp using a subtractor 52. The force setpoint value fsetp can also be 0 here, for example, the absolute value of the setpoint value for controlling the brake actuator, which can preferably be embodied as an electric motor. If the force actual value is below the force setpoint value, the force difference actual value Afact is greater than zero. The positive force difference 5 threshold value afsetp is subtracted from the force difference actual value Afact using a further subtractor 53. The force difference threshold value afsetp indicates the permitted tolerance of the difference between the setpoint force and the actual force. If the difference exceeds the tolerance, i.e. if 0 the signal at the output of the subtractor 53 is greater than zero, a two-point element 54 sets the logic signal LF to a high level. If the tolerance is not exceeded, the logic signal LF remains at a low level. A high level of the logic signal LF therefore indicates an excessively low effect of the brake 5 actuator or electric motor, which effect is due to damage to the brake actuator. By means of the AND element 55, which has here a PCT/EP2012/071329 - 16a 2011P22596WOUS total of five inputs in contrast to the AND element 13 according to fig. 1, the error PCT/EP2012/071329 - 17 2011P22596WOUS message signal BF is then generated at the output of an evaluation arrangement 56 which is changed only to a relatively small degree compared to the exemplary embodiment according to fig. 1. 5 In the illustrated exemplary embodiment it is assumed that, owing to the installation direction of the brake actuator or electric motor, the signs of the velocity v and of the force f are always different when the brake actuator or electric motor 0 generates a braking effect. Both signs are compared with one another using the evaluation element 19. Only in the case of different signs does the logic signal DS at the output of the two-point element 19 receive a high level. The logic signal DS in the exemplary embodiment shown in figure 3 thus signals a 5 braking brake actuator or electric motor, while in the exemplary embodiment shown in figure 1 it stands for non driving actuators. The signal DS is further processed in the same way in both exemplary embodiments. 0 In the exemplary embodiment according to figure 4, in which parts corresponding to parts according to fig. 3 are provided with the same reference symbols, the arrangement according to the invention is still further simplified compared to the exemplary embodiment according to figure 3. The exemplary 5 embodiment according to figure 4 does not in fact require the components 4 and 5 of the measuring device 1 according to fig. 3, with the result that here the measuring device is only composed of the inertia sensor package 1A. The evaluation arrangement 57 does not need the elements 11 and 12 of the 0 evaluation arrangement 56 according to fig. 3. The logic signal LD accordingly does not occur. The criterion for an excessively low overall deceleration of the rail vehicle, which could be due to damage to the brake system used, is therefore dispensed with in this exemplary embodiment. Correspondingly, an AND gate 5 58 with four inputs is sufficient.
    权利要求:
    Claims (34)
    [1] 1. A method for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement having a plurality of brake systems of a rail 5 vehicle, in which e the deceleration of the rail vehicle is detected by obtaining a deceleration measured variable (Adact), e the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail 0 is detected by obtaining a frictional engagement measured variable (Adsetp) , and e in the case of a small deceleration measured variable (Adact) and a normal frictional engagement measured variable (Adsetp) an error message signal (BF) is 5 generated.
    [2] 2. A method for monitoring a brake system having at least one brake actuator of a brake arrangement having a plurality of brake systems of a rail vehicle, in which 0 e the deceleration of the rail vehicle is detected by obtaining a deceleration measured variable (Adact), e the braking force (f) of the at least one brake actuator is measured, and e in the case of a small deceleration measured variable 5 (Adact) and a small braking force (f) an error message signal (BF) is generated.
    [3] 3. The method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized in that 0 e a deceleration difference actual value (Adact) is formed from a measured deceleration actual value (dact) and a predefined deceleration setpoint value (dsetp) as a deceleration measured variable, e the deceleration difference actual value (Adact) is 5 compared with a deceleration difference threshold value PCT/EP2012/071329 - 18a 2011P22596WOUS (Adsetp) by forming a deceleration difference intermediate value (Adzw) , and e in the case of a deceleration difference intermediate value (Adzw) which is above a tolerance value, a 5 deceleration defect signal (LD) is generated. PCT/EP2012/071329 - 19 2011P22596WOUS
    [4] 4. The method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that * the deceleration setpoint value (dsetp) is changed as a function of a measured speed actual value (vact) of the rail vehicle. 5
    [5] 5. The method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that * the speed actual value (vact) of the rail vehicle is compared with a speed limiting value (vimt) , and e in the case of a speed actual value (vact) which is below 0 the speed limiting value (vimt) , the formation of the error message signal (BF) is blocked.
    [6] 6. The method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that e a speed actual value (vact) of the rail vehicle is 5 measured and is compared with a speed limiting value (viimit) , and e in the case of a speed actual value (vact) which is below the speed limiting value (vimt) , the deceleration difference threshold value (Adsetp) is increased. 0
    [7] 7. The method as claimed in claim 1 or one of claims 3 to 6, characterized in that e in order to detect the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail at at least one wheel set of the rail 5 vehicle, a slip actual value is measured and is compared with a predefined slip threshold value, and e in the case of a slip actual value which is above the slip threshold value, a corresponding deceleration difference threshold value (Adsetp) is formed as a 0 frictional engagement measured variable.
    [8] 8. The method as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that * the deceleration difference threshold value (Adsetp) is increased in accordance with the determined number of 5 wheel sets with slip actual values which are above the slip threshold value. PCT/EP2012/071329 - 20 2011P22596WOUS
    [9] 9. The method as claimed in claim 1 or one of claims 3 to 6, characterized in that e in order to detect the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail at at least one wheel set of the rail 5 vehicle, a frictional engagement actual value in the wheel/rail contact is determined and is compared with a predefined frictional engagement threshold value, and e in the case of a frictional engagement actual value which is below the frictional engagement threshold 0 value, a corresponding deceleration difference threshold value is formed as a frictional engagement measured variable.
    [10] 10. The method as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that 5 e the deceleration difference threshold value is increased in accordance with the determined number of wheel sets with frictional engagement actual values which are below the frictional engagement threshold value. 0
    [11] 11. The method as claimed in one of claims 2 to 10, characterized in that e in the case of a brake system with at least one brake actuator a deceleration measurement signal and a speed measured variable of the rail vehicle are checked with 5 respect to their signs, and in the case of identical signs an error signal for connecting a further brake system is generated immediately.
    [12] 12. The method as claimed in claim 11, characterized in that 0 e the signs of the deceleration and speed measured variable of the rail vehicle are determined by means of an inertia sensor package.
    [13] 13. The method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that 5 e the braking force measurement is carried out by means of a force measurement and/or torque measurement on an axle PCT/EP2012/071329 - 20a 2011P22596WOUS of the rail vehicle which is assigned to the brake actuator. PCT/EP2012/071329 - 21 2011P22596WOUS
    [14] 14. The method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that * the braking force measurement is carried out by means of sensors on a deformation body which is reversibly deformed by the braking. 5
    [15] 15. The method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that * the braking force measurement is carried out in the case of an electric actuator by measuring currents and voltages. 0
    [16] 16. The method as claimed in any of claims 12 to 15, characterized in that e a force difference actual value (Afact) is formed from a measured force actual value (fact) and a predefined force 5 setpoint value (fsetp), e the force difference actual value (Afact) is compared with a force difference threshold value (afsetp) by forming a force difference intermediate value (af.w), and 0 e in the case of a force difference intermediate value (af.w) which is above a tolerance value, a force defect signal (LF) is generated.
    [17] 17. The method as claimed in claim 16, characterized in that 5 e the force setpoint value (fsetp) is changed as a function of a measured speed actual value (vact) of the rail vehicle.
    [18] 18. The method as claimed in claim 16, characterized in that 0 e the force setpoint value (fsetp) is changed as a function of the rotational speed of a wheel set which is connected to the brake actuator. PCT/EP2012/071329 - 22 2011P22596WOUS
    [19] 19. An arrangement for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement having a plurality of brake systems of a rail vehicle, having e a measuring device (1) for the deceleration of the rail 5 vehicle, e a measuring apparatus (2) for the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail, and e an evaluation arrangement (3) which is arranged downstream of the measuring device (1) and the measuring 0 apparatus (2) and outputs an error message signal (BF) in the case of a small deceleration of the rail vehicle and a normal frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail. 5
    [20] 20. An arrangement for monitoring a brake system having at least one brake actuator of a brake arrangement having a plurality of brake systems of a rail vehicle, having e a measuring device (1) for the deceleration of the rail vehicle, 0 e a measuring arrangement (49) for the braking force of the at least one brake actuator, and e an evaluation arrangement (56) which is arranged downstream of the measuring device (1) and the measuring arrangement (49) and outputs an error message signal 5 (BF) in the case of a small deceleration and a small braking force. PCT/EP2012/071329 - 23 2011P22596WOUS
    [21] 21. The arrangement as claimed in claim 19 or 20, characterized in that * the measuring device (1) and the evaluation arrangement (3) are embodied in such a way that 5 e they form a deceleration difference actual value (Adact) from a measured deceleration actual value (dact) and a predefined deceleration setpoint value (dsetp) as a deceleration measured variable, e they compare the deceleration difference actual value 0 (Adact) with a deceleration difference threshold value (Adsetp) as a frictional engagement measured variable by forming a deceleration difference intermediate value (Adzw) , and e in the case of a deceleration difference intermediate 5 value (Adzw) which is above a tolerance value, they generate a deceleration defect signal (LB).
    [22] 22. The arrangement as claimed in claim 21, characterized in that 0 e a detection device (15), in which the speed actual value (vact) of the rail vehicle is compared with a speed limiting value (vimit) , is arranged upstream of the evaluation arrangement (3), and * which detection device (15), in the case of a speed 5 actual value (vact) which is below the speed limiting value (vimit), outputs a blocking signal (LV) to the evaluation arrangement (3), with which blocking signal (LV) a formation of the error message signal (BF) in the evaluation arrangement (3) is blocked. 30
    [23] 23. The arrangement as claimed in claim 21 or 22, characterized in that * the detection device (15) has on the input side an evaluation stage (15A) which is connected by its input 5 to the output of an inertia sensor package (1A) and is embodied in such a way that it outputs at its output a PCT/EP2012/071329 - 23a 2011P22596WOUS speed measurement variable, which is not influenced by the acceleration due to gravity or the centrifugal acceleration, of the rail vehicle. PCT/EP2012/071329 - 24 2011P22596WOUS
    [24] 24. The arrangement as claimed in claim 22 or 23, characterized in that * the evaluation stage (15A) is also connected on the output side to the measuring apparatus (2) and with its 5 speed measured variable (v) causes an increase in the deceleration difference threshold value (Adsetp) to occur at said measuring apparatus in the case of a speed actual value which is below a speed limiting value. 0
    [25] 25. The arrangement as claimed in claim 19 or one of claims 21 to 24, characterized in that e in order to detect the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail at at least one wheel set of the rail vehicle, a slip actual value measuring stage is provided 5 in which the measured slip actual value is compared with a predefined slip threshold value, and which, e in the case of a slip actual value which is above the slip threshold value, brings about an increase in the corresponding deceleration difference threshold value. 0
    [26] 26. The arrangement as claimed in claim 25, characterized in that e a counter for determining the number of wheel sets with slip actual values which are above the slip threshold 5 value is present, which counter generates a signal for increasing the deceleration difference threshold value in accordance with the determined number of wheel sets with slip actual values which are above the slip threshold value. 30 PCT/EP2012/071329 - 25 2011P22596WOUS
    [27] 27. The arrangement as claimed in claim 19 or one of claims 21 to 24, characterized in that e in order to detect the frictional engagement between the wheel and the rail at at least one wheel set of the rail 5 vehicle, a measuring stage for the frictional engagement actual value in the wheel/rail contact is provided, which measuring stage is designed to compare the frictional engagement actual value with a predefined frictional engagement threshold value and to form a 0 corresponding deceleration difference threshold value in the case of a frictional engagement actual value which is below the frictional engagement threshold value.
    [28] 28. The arrangement as claimed in claim 27, characterized in 5 that e a counting stage is present which detects the number of wheel sets with frictional engagement actual values which are below the frictional engagement threshold value and outputs a counting signal for increasing the 0 deceleration difference threshold value in accordance with the determined number of wheel sets with frictional engagement actual values which are below the frictional engagement threshold value. 5
    [29] 29. The arrangement as claimed in claims 20 to 22, characterized in that e at least one force/torque meter is arranged upstream of the measuring arrangement and is provided on an axle of the rail vehicle which is assigned to the brake 0 actuator. PCT/EP2012/071329 - 26 2011P22596WOUS
    [30] 30. The arrangement as claimed in claim 29, characterized in that * the measuring arrangement (49) and the evaluation arrangement (3) are embodied in such a way that they 5 form a braking force difference actual value (Afact) from a measured braking force actual value (fact) and a predefined braking force setpoint value (fsetp), e they compare the braking force difference actual value (Afact) with a braking force difference threshold value 0 (afsetp) by forming a braking force difference intermediate value (afzw) , and e in the case of a braking force difference intermediate value (afzw) which is above a tolerance value, they generate a braking force defect signal (LF). 5
    [31] 31. The arrangement as claimed in claims 20 to 22, characterized in that e a deformation body which is reversibly deformed by the braking is provided with sensors for measuring the 0 braking force.
    [32] 32. The arrangement as claimed in one of claims 20 to 22, characterized in that e in the case of an electric actuator a current measuring 5 device and/or voltage measuring device is assigned thereto for measuring the braking force.
    [33] 33. The arrangement as claimed in one of claims 19 to 32, characterized in that 0 e a high-speed activation stage is provided which is supplied on the input side with a measured variable which is proportional to the deceleration and with a measured variable which is proportional to the speed of the rail vehicle, and said high-speed activation stage 5 is embodied in such a way that it checks the measured variables with respect to their signs, and in the case PCT/EP2012/071329 - 26a 2011P22596WOUS of identical signs immediately generates an error signal for connecting a further brake system. PCT/EP2012/071329 - 27 2011P22596WOUS
    [34] 34. The arrangement as claimed in claim 33, characterized in that e an inertia sensor package is provided with which the magnitude and signs of the deceleration and speed of the 5 rail vehicle are determined.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    AU2012358735B2|2015-11-19|Method and arrangement for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement of a rail vehicle
    JP5525404B2|2014-06-18|Railway vehicle state monitoring device, state monitoring method, and rail vehicle
    HUE027471T2|2016-09-28|Safety device and control method for a lift system
    US20110264301A1|2011-10-27|Method for determining a travel direction and control device for a vehicle system
    JP2003146036A|2003-05-21|Method for detecting separation beginning of traveling tread of pneumatic tire in vehicle
    KR101583926B1|2016-01-08|Method for detecting malfunction of brake system using yawrate
    US20190041425A1|2019-02-07|Method for detecting a defect in an acceleration sensor, and measuring system
    JP3996957B2|2007-10-24|Tire condition monitoring device
    KR20140050470A|2014-04-29|Apparatus and method for stabilizing vehicle drive using fail safety function of wheel speed sensor
    EP3002576B1|2019-02-20|Method for detecting unbalance of a wheel, electronic control unit and storage medium
    JP2002022766A|2002-01-23|Sensor failure determining device
    WO2018155489A1|2018-08-30|Vehicle control device, vehicle control method, and program
    US9187074B2|2015-11-17|Method for monitoring a wheel of a rail vehicle
    KR20160127942A|2016-11-07|Apparatus for detecting fault of wheel speed sensor in a vehicle and control method thereof
    KR20150039966A|2015-04-14|Failure diagnosis method using lateral acceleration ＆ steering angle as variable
    KR101179105B1|2012-09-07|method to detect creep noise in wheel speed sensor
    KR101758142B1|2017-07-14|Tire cooling control device in chassis dynamometer
    KR20140040939A|2014-04-04|Method for judging wheel speed sensor malfunction and apparatus using the same
    US9123188B2|2015-09-01|Acceleration sensor fault detection apparatus
    JP2020175832A|2020-10-29|Control system for automobile and control method for automobile
    US20160163128A1|2016-06-09|Vehicle control device
    KR20140081490A|2014-07-01|Method for Detecting Failure of Wheel Speed Sensor
    JP6071692B2|2017-02-01|Vehicle control device
    KR20150140958A|2015-12-17|Electronic control system in a vehicle and method thereof
    KR20150125235A|2015-11-09|Method for sensing air-gap error in a wheel speed sensor
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    ES2768038T3|2020-06-19|
    US20140343769A1|2014-11-20|
    RU2586911C2|2016-06-10|
    AU2012358735B2|2015-11-19|
    RU2014130029A|2016-02-10|
    EP2766234A1|2014-08-20|
    US9221476B2|2015-12-29|
    BR112014014901A2|2017-06-13|
    EP2766234B1|2019-11-27|
    WO2013091957A1|2013-06-27|
    CN104024070B|2018-01-02|
    HUE049478T2|2020-09-28|
    DE102011089653A1|2013-06-27|
    CN104024070A|2014-09-03|
    CA2860093A1|2013-06-27|
    CN107813804A|2018-03-20|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    DE19510755C2|1995-03-24|1998-09-17|Abb Patent Gmbh|Brake arrangement for a rail-bound locomotive with multiple braking systems|
    DK1181179T3|1999-05-19|2006-04-10|Aea Technology Plc|Increase of wheel / rail adhesion|
    DE10004430C2|2000-02-02|2001-12-06|Siemens Ag|Brake monitoring arrangement for a vehicle with multiple braking systems|
    DE10026687B4|2000-05-30|2004-08-26|Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH|Method and device for monitoring the effectiveness of vehicle brake systems|
    US20040225421A1|2003-05-05|2004-11-11|Hengning Wu|Personal transportation system|
    DE10331199A1|2003-07-10|2005-01-27|Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH|Braking device of a rail vehicle|
    DE102005010118A1|2005-03-02|2006-09-14|Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH|Control device of a rail vehicle|
    AT503060A1|2005-04-28|2007-07-15|Siemens Transportation Systems|ADAPTIVE SLIDE PROTECTION FOR RAIL VEHICLES|
    DE102006011963B3|2006-02-23|2007-08-30|Siemens Ag|Rail vehicle braking method, involves controlling different braking system on basis of availability, and set-point force is distributed between brake systems, considering mass to be braked and actual forces, by management function|
    TW200918380A|2007-04-03|2009-05-01|Bombardier Transp Gmbh|Track brake controller|
    DE102008028264B3|2008-06-13|2009-12-17|Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH|Method for monitoring at least one system parameter influencing the operating behavior of vehicles or vehicle trains|
    CN102092382B|2011-01-21|2013-03-27|铁道部运输局|Diagnosis service system for brake control device of rail transit vehicle|
    CN102152780B|2011-03-18|2013-02-13|铁道部运输局|Brake system and brake processing method for rail transit vehicle|EP2837524B1|2013-08-14|2020-02-12|Siemens Mobility S.A.S.|Method for minimising the electricity consumption of a public transport network, and associated computational platform|
    US9499183B2|2015-02-23|2016-11-22|Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.|System and method for stopping trains using simultaneous parameter estimation|
    DE102015116862A1|2015-10-05|2017-04-06|Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH|Apparatus and method for adaptive anti-skid control|
    ITUB20159358A1|2015-12-22|2017-06-22|Faiveley Transport Italia Spa|Procedure for checking and recovering the adherence of the wheels of a controlled axle of a railway vehicle.|
    JP6889057B2|2017-07-14|2021-06-18|株式会社東芝|Information processing equipment, information processing methods and computer programs|
    DE102017213186A1|2017-07-31|2019-01-31|Siemens Aktiengesellschaft|Method and arrangement for monitoring a drive system of a track-bound vehicle|
    DE102017215290A1|2017-08-31|2019-02-28|Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH|Method for determining the safety-related status of brakes on rail vehicles|
    IT201700100433A1|2017-09-07|2019-03-07|Faiveley Transport Italia Spa|Control procedure of a braking system of at least one railway vehicle.|
    法律状态:
    2016-03-24| MK25| Application lapsed reg. 22.2i(2) - failure to pay acceptance fee|
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    DE102011089653A|DE102011089653A1|2011-12-22|2011-12-22|Method and arrangement for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement of a rail vehicle|
    DE102011089653.8||2011-12-22||
    PCT/EP2012/071329|WO2013091957A1|2011-12-22|2012-10-29|Method and arrangement for monitoring a brake system of a brake arrangement of a rail vehicle|
    [返回顶部]